|
When Ideals Become Idols
In the first two Commandments we learn the
first things on God’s mind when He tells us how we should treat Him: You shall have no
other gods before Me. You shall not make
for yourself an idol in the form of anything. It sounds simple.
But idolatry has many forms. Having outgrown the graven image, American culture
worships ideals: freedom, tolerance, equal-opportunity, justice, fairness,
peace, and so on. Being intangibles,
these idols are less visible and possibly more dangerous. An ideal becomes an
idol when its success means more to us than the God who inspired it or the
people who oppose it. Serving an ideal allows us to feel noble, energized, like
we are surely on God’s side. That could be why
many activists think themselves spiritually empowered—and perhaps why
some go too far. They do not realize that serving a virtue or characteristic of
God is not the same as serving God Himself. Christians who
become politically involved must be on guard against this. We are too easily
swollen with ourselves and should remember that God has no need of us that way.
To serve God with integrity requires a submission that unmasks one’s pride and
tempers any sense of ennoblement. There are historical
examples of people who did not lose sight of God’s priorities; who did not let
ideals become idols. I offer two: If you read the speeches Abraham Lincoln gave
before and during the Civil War you sense love for his enemies. He had no hatred
for those who held slaves, and he spoke as if he yearned for the day when the
truth would prevail and the two sides would be reconciled to each other. But
the love he had for his enemies in no way stayed him from seeking their defeat.
Martin Luther King,
Jr., during the Civil Rights Movement, allowed Christianity to empower his
quest for equality of all people. He constantly reminded his followers that
equality and racial harmony were God’s desire for all, and he did it in the
face of deep-seated venom taking the form of dogs, arson, murder, fire hoses,
and jail time. In both cases love
for the opponent was as prominent as the opposition itself. That is, redemption
of the people involved in the sin was kept primary. I suspect all godly causes
are characterized this way. |